Public-Private Highways

Public-Private Highways:

Careening Toward Failure Nationwide

 

Public-private transportation projects have been touted as the cure-all for all that ails the highways of the nation. In fact, they have just made the taxpayer ride much bumpier, full of potholes that consists of corruption, loan defaults, and eroding public roads because of “non-compete” contracts all of which have led to taxpayers picking up the tab for huge private profits.

 

Public/Private Toll Road Projects Are Subject To Corruption, Fraud,  Bond and Loan Defaults And Political Payoffs.

 

Despite optimistic predictions by all involved, the road failed to attract anything close to the 33,000 vehicles a day required for the company to make loan payments, let alone the 68,000 vehicles a day needed to turn a profit. In early 1996, the road was averaging 10,500 vehicles daily.

For example, the $200 million, 16-mile Southern Connector in Greenville S.C., was designed to steer traffic towards some private developers’ planned projects, the road opened just as the recession hit in February 2001. Drivers detour to avoid the $1.50 toll so less than half the projected 28,000 commuters use it daily. (Business Week 8/5/02)

 

There is a history of feasibility studies for toll roads being overly optimistic,” says John J. Hallacy III, director of municipal bond research for Merrill Lynch and Co., told Business Week.

 

“Of the 10 major private toll roads constructed since the mid-1990s, nearly half carry far less traffic than projected. Some $4 billion in toll road bonds risk default over the next five years unless they’re refinanced, estimates Robert H. Mueller, a municipal bond analyst at the J.P. Morgan securities Inc. (Business Week 8/5/02 )

Last year (2005),Virginia paid $389,000 in maintenance on the Pocahontas Parkway.  So far, the parkway hasn’t repaid the state. (SBT 1/23/06)

 

In 2002, according to the case studies provided by Alexis Perrotta and Jonathan Peters in the briefing papers for this forum, “bond ratings (for the Parkway) were lowered to negative and below investment grade.  It appeared that toll revenue would be insufficient to pay off outstanding bonds.  Since then, tolls have been increased from $1.50 to $2.25. (Briefing Papers, Pg. 17)

The winning team for the Trans-Texas contract, CINTRA gave $800,000.  (Citizens Against the TCC).

 

The Texas State leadership – Governor, Lt. Governor, Attorney General, Comptroller and House Speaker – received a total of $1.2 million in contributions from highway contractors. (Citizens Against the TCC)

 

The contract winner, CINTRA, will collect and keep all tolls on the TCC for 50 years. (Citizens Against the TCC)

 

Toll increases may be unpopular, inefficient or inequitable. An example is Toronto’s Highway 407 where a private firm initially raised tolls more than 250 percent. (Pg. 21)

 

Private toll road operators might choose to maximize profits, which could result in significant traffic delay. (Pg. 21)

 

Ignoring risk in PPP projects is likely to result in cost overruns, delays in service provision, reduced output and lower levels of service or the adoption of inferior projects. (Pg. 27)

 

SOURCES:

http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/fortwayne/news/local/13690590.htm

http://www.gmionline.org/may1996.htm

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright ©2005 STOPprivatization.com is property of the Public Employees Federation. All rights reserved.
Direct questions and comments to the Privatization@pef.org
Privacy Policy

Last Update 5/26/2010

GoPublic Video

Hit Counter